vol 16, num 2 | May, 2019
 
 
committeeslogo
 
Bankruptcy Litigation
 
AN ABI COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER
 
Visit the Bankruptcy Litigation Committee page
 
 
 
► IN THIS ISSUE:
 
space-height
 
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Extends Barton Doctrine to Trustees of Mass-Tort Litigation Trust
Michael F. Holbein
 
Michael F. Holbein
Arnall Golden Gregory LLP
Atlanta
 
 
A Delaware Bankruptcy Court has held that litigants pursuing post-confirmation state law fraud claims against the trustees of a mass-tort litigation trust must first seek leave from the bankruptcy court that established the trust. In Smith v. Hilton (In re Swan Transportation Co.), the bankruptcy court had previously confirmed the debtor’s plan establishing a litigation trust to handle asbestos- and silica-related claims against one of the debtor’s subsidiaries. Under the plan, three trustees were appointed to administer claims against the trust. Over a decade after the plan was confirmed, three individuals filed claims against the trust seeking recompense for alleged asbestos- and silica-related injuries. Two of the claims were disallowed on the grounds that the claimants had not suffered a “qualifying injury,” and the third claim was paid the distribution percentage established under the trust’s claim-resolution procedures.
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Ninth Circuit (Sort of) Splits from First Circuit to Hold that § 106(a)’s Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Extends to Emotional Distress Damages for Willful Stay Violations
John Cannizzaro
 
John Cannizzaro
Ice Miller LLP
Columbus, Ohio
 
 
In enacting § 106(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, Congress waived the government’s ability to assert the defense of sovereign immunity with respect to a variety of Bankruptcy Code provisions. Section 106(a) specifically authorizes the court to “issue against a governmental unit an order, process, or judgment under such sections or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, including an order or judgment awarding a money recovery, but not including an award of punitive damages,” with respect to certain specified sections of the Bankruptcy Code. Section 362, which is one of those specifically enumerated provisions in § 106, authorizes the bankruptcy court to award “actual damages, including costs and attorneys’ fees, and, in appropriate circumstances, [] punitive damages.” At least in the Ninth Circuit, “actual damages” includes damages for emotional distress. So a court should be able to award emotional distress damages against the government, right?
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
The Fifth Circuit Recognizes Broad Immunities for Trustees and Their Counsel
Christopher G. Bradley
 
Christopher G. Bradley
University of Kentucky College of Law
Lexington, Ky.
 
 
Trustees and their counsel can breathe easier in the Fifth Circuit. In a published, precedential opinion, the court joined several other circuits in affirming that bankruptcy trustees and their counsel are entitled to immunity for personal harms caused by actions that fall within the scope of their official duties. This “qualified immunity” joins the “absolute immunity” that the court’s precedent already recognized for “all actions taken pursuant to a court order.” In light of these protections, the court noted that “[o]nly ultra vires actions — actions that fall outside the scope of their duties as trustees — are not entitled to immunity.”
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
State Sovereign Immunity Bars Adversary Proceeding Concerning Tax Refunds
David M. Guess
 
David M. Guess
Bienert | Katzman, PLC
San Clemente, Calif.
 
 
Before litigating an adversary proceeding or contested matter against a state or its agencies, plaintiffs would be wise to consider whether the state entity has a colorable sovereign immunity defense. In In re La Paloma Generating Co., Delaware Chief Bankruptcy Judge Christopher S. Sontchi determined that California’s sovereign immunity barred the liquidating trustee’s motion for a determination of tax liability — specifically the right to property tax refunds — under Bankruptcy Code § 505 against the California State Board of Equalization (SBE).
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Bankruptcy Litigation Committee Announces Leaders for 2019
The Bankruptcy Litigation Committee is proud to announce our new leaders for 2019!

You can also visit the committee's homepage for more newsletter articles, relevant recordings and other committee information.

The committee is always eager to welcome new volunteers. Please contact any member of our leadership team to find out how you can get involved.

Jeremy R. Fischer
 
Jeremy R. Fischer
Co-chair

Drummond Woodsum
Portland, Maine
 
 
Steven S. Flores
 
Steven S. Flores
Co-Chair

Rhode Island Legal Services, Inc.
Providence, R.I.
 
 
Isley Markman Gostin
 
Isley Markman Gostin
Communications Manager

WilmerHale
Washington, D.C.
 
 
Peter J. Keane
 
Peter J. Keane
Education director

Pachulski Stang Ziehl & Jones LLP
Wilmington, Del.
 
 
Kesha Tanabe
 
Kesha Tanabe
Membership Relations Director

Tanabe Law
Minneapolis, Minn.
 
 
Joseph C. Barsalona, II
 
Joseph C. Barsalona, II
Newsletter Editor

Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Wilmington, Del.
 
 
Amanda Demby
 
Amanda Demby
Special Projects Leader

Province, Inc.
Henderson, Nev.
 
 
James S. Green, Jr.
 
James S. Green, Jr.
Special Projects Leader

Landis Rath & Cobb LLP
Wilmington, Del.
 
 
 
 
 
 
abiLIVE 5/21/19
 
 
 
New York City Bankruptcy Conference 5/22/19
 
 
 
logo-footer
 
icon_circle-facebook icon_circle-twitter icon_circle-linkedin icon_circle-instagram
 
©2019 American Bankruptcy Institute . All rights reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600, Alexandria, VA 22314