vol 20, num 3 | July 2021
 
 
committeeslogo
 
Business Reorganization
 
AN ABI COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER
 
Visit the Business Reorganization Committee page
 
 
► IN this issue:
 
 
 
Wave of New Mass Litigation-Driven Bankruptcies May Test the Limits of Nonconsensual Third‑Party Releases
George R. Howard
 
George R. Howard
Vinson & Elkins LLP
New York
 
Kiran Vakamudi
 
Kiran Vakamudi
Vinson & Elkins LLP
New York
 
Eli Medina
 
Eli Medina
Vinson & Elkins LLP
New York
 
 
Since the passage of the modern version of the Bankruptcy Code in 1978, chapter 11 has been used as a tool by debtors to address mass litigation liabilities. While there are certain limitations and exceptions, chapter 11 can be a preferred avenue to address mass litigation liabilities because (1) the automatic stay of § 362 of the Bankruptcy Code generally halts most pending litigation, (2) cases pending in different jurisdictions around the country potentially can be removed and consolidated in front of a single court for resolution pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1452, and (3) the related liabilities from such litigation generally can be discharged by the debtor pursuant to § 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code.

In addition to these and other relevant statutory provisions in the Bankruptcy Code, chapter 11 cases seeking to address mass litigation liabilities have seen the development of third-party release provisions and related channeling injunctions that limit or extinguish the liability of nondebtors. In effect, in exchange for a large contribution of value to fund recoveries for litigation claimants, a nondebtor entity with a close relationship to the debtor effectively obtains the benefit of the discharge under § 1141 of the Bankruptcy Code through a broad channeling injunction and release of claims. Indeed, the use of such third-party releases and channeling injunctions to address the massive litigation liabilities arising from asbestos exposure was codified with the addition of § 524(g) to the Bankruptcy Code in 1994.

However, for mass litigation liabilities that are not related to asbestos exposure, there is no specific provision in the Bankruptcy Code authorizing such channeling injunctions for the benefit of nondebtors. Moreover, there is a split of authority among the circuit courts regarding the propriety of such provisions.
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Dismissal of First SBRA Case Filed in West Virginia, In re BK Technologies Inc., Raises Issue of Whether an SBRA Debtor Must Be a Going Concern in Order to Invoke Chapter 11 Protection
Salene Mazur Kraemer
 
Salene Mazur Kraemer
Bernstein Burkley
Wheeling, W.Va.
 
 
On March 29, 2021, in In re BK Technologies Inc., newly appointed Chief Bankruptcy Judge McKay Mignault dismissed the first Small Business Reorganization Act (SBRA) case filed in West Virginia due to lack of a realistic ability to reorganize and the debtor’s bad faith. One of the key issues in the case was whether the SBRA debtor could utilize the bankruptcy process to liquidate what little it had left even after it has already been shut down for months. In dismissing the case, the court ruled that it could not.

The holding in the BK Technologies case sheds light on the newly enacted SBRA and whether an SBRA debtor’s business can be DOA (dead on arrival) on the petition date.

 
READ MORE
 
 
 
ABI's "Industry Viewpoints"
Want to learn more about the different industries that bankruptcy affects?

ABI’s got you covered! Check out our “Industry Viewpoints” video series, featuring ABI Editor-at-Large Bill Rochelle discussing various industries with prominent bankruptcy professionals. The first four conversations have been previously posted on our social media platforms (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn and YouTube).

Make sure to check out Bill’s most recent conversation with Scott A. Wolfson of Wolfson Bolton PLLC (Troy, Mich.) on the auto industry.

Industry Viewpoints: Auto Industry

Previous guests of “#IndustryViewpoints” have included:

Be sure to view the ABI YouTube Channel and follow ABI on social media (twitter.abi.org, facebook.abi.org or linked.abi.org) to be notified of upcoming episodes!

 
 
 
 
Business Reorganization Committee Leadership for 2021
The Business Reorganization Committee is proud to announce our new leaders for 2021!

You can also visit the committee's homepage for more newsletter articles, relevant recordings and other committee information.

The committee is always eager to welcome new volunteers. Please contact any member of our leadership team to find out how you can get involved.

Robert S. Marticello photo
 
Robert S. Marticello
Co-Chair

Smiley Wang-Ekvall, LLP
Costa Mesa, Calif.
 
 
Jordana L. Renert photo
 
Jordana L. Renert
Co-Chair

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
New York
 
 
Jacob S. Frumkin photo
 
Jacob S. Frumkin
Communications Manager

Cole Schotz P.C.
Hackensack, N.J.
 
 
Jamie J. Fell photo
 
Jamie J. Fell
Education Director

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
New York
 
 
Krista Kulp
 
Krista L. Kulp
Newsletter Editor

Cole Schotz P.C.
Hackensack, N.J.
 
 
Bradley Cosman photo
 
Bradley A. Cosman
Special Projects Leader

Perkins Coie LLP
Phoenix
 
 
 
 
 
 
MID-ATLANTIC BANKRUPTCY WORKSHOP
 
 
 
MIDWEST REGIONAL BANKRUPTCY SEMINAR
 
 
 
logo-footer
 
icon_circle-facebook icon_circle-twitter icon_circle-linkedin icon_circle-instagram
 
©2021 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 
View Online  |  Manage Your Preferences