vol 21, num 2 | June 2022
 
 
committeeslogo
 
Business Reorganization
 
AN ABI COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER
 
Visit the Business Reorganization Committee page
 
 
► IN this issue:
 
 
 
Liquidating Substantially All Assets in a Subchapter V Chapter 11: A Recent Case Study
Eric H. Horn
 
Eric H. Horn
A.Y. Strauss
Roseland, N.J.
 
 
Since going effective on Feb. 19, 2020, much has been written regarding the restructuring benefits of a chapter 11, subchapter V case. Prior to its implementation, many small businesses were, from a practical standpoint, unable to benefit from chapter 11 due to the expense of filing and prosecuting a traditional chapter 11 case. The introduction of subchapter V has shifted that, thus giving smaller businesses a streamlined process to recognize the benefits of a chapter 11 restructuring. Indeed, the stated purpose of subchapter V is to streamline the process by which small business debtors reorganize and rehabilitate their financial affairs.
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
The Cost of Resolving Mass Tort Claims Through Bankruptcy
Andrew T. Perry
 
Andrew T. Perry
Foran Glennon Palandech Ponzi & Rudloff PC
Denver
 
 
The term “mootness” refers to a category of related precepts that preclude a reviewing court from reaching the underlying merits of a controversy. While questions dog this doctrine’s constitutional and prudential forms outside of the Bankruptcy Code’s ambit, few doubt either’s general validity. However, within bankruptcy’s periphery, more substantive questions abound. There, constitutional mootness’s recognizable form blurs, and the prudential doctrine dubiously known as equitable mootness resists pragmatic simplification.
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Severing Third-Party Releases: A Path Forward After Patterson
Jon Schlotterback
 
Jon Schlotterback
U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Western District of Virginia
Roanoke, Va.
 
 
In an opinion issued on January 13, 2022, Judge David Novak of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia struck down non-consensual third-party releases from a plan confirmed by the bankruptcy court. While appellate courts commonly consider the wholesale invalidation of releases and subsequent remand of confirmed plans of reorganization or liquidation (“plans”), Judge Novak took the uncommon step in Patterson to sever these releases from the confirmed plan before remanding it on other grounds. After finding the releases lacked sufficient factual and legal support, Judge Novak concluded they should not only be invalidated but should be altogether severed from the plan.
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Post-Petition, Pre-Solicitation Plan-Support Covenants: Potential Tools for Mitigating a Free-Fall Filing
Stephen D. Piraino
 
Stephen D. Piraino
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
New York
 
Matthew B. Masaro
 
Matthew B. Masaro
Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP
New York
 
 
In bankruptcy, a debtor-in-possession’s chief goal is to get its plan of reorganization confirmed by the bankruptcy court. Among other things, the Bankruptcy Code requires that at least one class of impaired creditors vote to accept the plan — i.e., that at least two-thirds in amount and one-half in number of the allowed claims in such class accept the plan. Garnering the necessary creditor support for a plan is not always an easy undertaking, which has led to the modern trend of debtors filing pre-packaged or pre-arranged chapter 11 cases to ensure they have a clearer path to a confirmable plan. However, it is not always feasible to secure creditor support before filing for bankruptcy — especially for debtors who “free fall” into bankruptcy. Therefore, some debtors who “free fall” into bankruptcy are using post-petition, pre-solicitation plan-support covenants to ensure that come plan-voting time, they will have — or be close to having — the necessary votes to confirm a plan.

In In re Grupo Aeroméxico S.A.B. de C.V., the debtors had no choice but to file a “free fall” case given the immediate, drastic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on their businesses. However, during Aeroméxico’s chapter 11 cases (the “AMX cases”), the debtors were able to secure post-petition plan-support covenants with certain creditors to lock in material amounts of plan support early in the case. Importantly, even in the face of objection, the court found that such covenants were permitted.

 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Business Reorganization Committee Leadership for 2022
The Business Reorganization Committee is proud to announce our new leaders for 2022!

You can also visit the committee's homepage for more newsletter articles, relevant recordings and other committee information.

The committee is always eager to welcome new volunteers. Please contact any member of our leadership team to find out how you can get involved.

Jamie J. Fell photo
 
Jamie J. Fell
Co-Chair

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett
New York
 
 
Robert S. Marticello photo
 
Robert S. Marticello
Co-Chair

Smiley Wang-Ekvall, LLP
Costa Mesa, Calif.
 
 
Scott D. Lawrence photo
 
Scott D. Lawrence
Communications Manager

Wick Phillips
Dallas
 
 
Krista Kulp
 
Krista L. Kulp
Education director

Cole Schotz P.C.
Hackensack, N.J.
 
 
Dov Gottlieb
 
Dov Gottlieb
Membership relations Director

Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
New York
 
 
Colleen Restel photo
 
Colleen Restel
Newsletter editor

Lowenstein Sandler LLP
Roseland, N.J.
 
 
Bradley Cosman photo
 
Bradley A. Cosman
Special Projects Leader

Perkins Coie LLP
Phoenix
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CENTRAL STATES BANKRUPTCY WORKSHOP
 
 
 
NORTHEAST BANKRUPTCY CONFERENCE & CONSUMER FORUM
 
 
 
logo-footer
 
icon_circle-facebook icon_circle-twitter icon_circle-linkedin icon_circle-instagram
 
©2022 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 
View Online  |  Manage Your Preferences