vol 16, num 3 | OCTOBER 2022
 
 
committeeslogo
 
Financial Advisors and
Investment Banking
 
AN ABI COMMITTEE NEWSLETTER
 
Visit the Financial Advisors and
Investment Banking Committee page
 
 
► IN this issue:
 
 
 
Co-Chairs Corner: A Governance Subcommittee of ABI’s Financial Advisors and Investment Banking Committee
Michael R. Nestor
 
Michael R. Nestor
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP.
Wilmington, Del.
 
 
Hello! I was recently appointed co-chair of ABI’s Financial Advisors and Investment Banking (FAIB) Committee, and I could not be more excited. I’m a restructuring/bankruptcy partner at Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP, and have been in the business for more than 27 years. The goal of my involvement is to leverage the expertise of the members of the FAIB ABI’s other committees to develop programming focused on numerous aspects of distressed governance. If you are my “friend” (is that the term?) on LinkedIn, then you know that my motto is “Proper Governance = Max Value + Deal Certainty.”
 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Taking the Road Less Traveled: Three Alternatives to Chapter 11 for Suppliers in the Post-COVID Era
Patricia Burgess
 
Patricia Burgess
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Nashville, Tenn.
 
Joy Kleisinger
 
Joy Kleisinger
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Cincinnati
 
A.J. Webb
 
A.J. Webb
Frost Brown Todd LLC
Cincinnati
 
The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted every level of the supply chain for suppliers and manufacturers. However, despite the added stress of a strained supply chain, labor shortages and the rising costs of raw materials, suppliers have largely avoided the chapter 11 process. In lieu of filing a bankruptcy petition, manufacturers and suppliers have sought out nonbankruptcy remedies, including out-of-court workouts, state law assignments for the benefit of creditors, and Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) enforcement rights.

The utilization of out-of-court remedies has been particularly popular in the automotive industry. Given the complexity of the decision to file chapter 11, it is important for manufacturers, suppliers and lenders to understand the associated benefits, risks and available alternatives to filing for bankruptcy.

Filing for Bankruptcy: Pros and Cons
Chapter 11 undoubtedly offers significant benefits to organizations in distress and their creditors, but sometimes the expense, obligations and oversight that accompanies a bankruptcy filing outweigh the relief afforded by the Bankruptcy Code. When a company files for chapter 11 relief to effectuate a § 363 sale, liquidation or a restructuring, the company must consider significant professional and filing fees, which can make bankruptcy too expensive for some companies (and reduce funds available for distribution to creditors).

Congress attempted to streamline the chapter 11 process to make it a more viable option for smaller businesses with the passage the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019, which created subchapter V of chapter 11. Under subchapter V, businesses with less than $7.5 million in debt are able to bypass some of the more onerous aspects of chapter 11, including, among other things, elimination of the obligation to submit a disclosure statement and elimination of the absolute priority rule.

 
READ MORE
 
 
 
The Intersection of the 1111(b) Election and Subchapter V
Melissa Davis
 
Melissa Davis
KapilaMukamal, LLP
Fort Lauderdale, Fla.
 
 
As subchapter V matters continue to become a meaningful part of an insolvency practice, lawyers and financial advisors should be aware of the nuances that can arise in such matters when they intersect with the more complicated areas of bankruptcy law. The § 1111(b) election within a subchapter V matter falls squarely within this realm, and its application has led some cases into uncharted territory.

The § 1111(b) Election
The § 1111(b) election allows a partially secured/undersecured creditor to waive its unsecured deficiency claim and elect to treat its entire claims as secured. The election can protect a creditor against the undervaluation of the collateral in a market that may be temporarily depressed, and a subsequent sale of that collateral when values rebound, resulting in a financial benefit to the debtor. The election allows the secured creditor to retain a lien on the collateral equal to the full amount of the claim. While the secured creditor that elects § 1111(b) will not participate as an unsecured creditor in the plan process, it retains the benefit of any post confirmation appreciation.

 
READ MORE
 
 
 
Success Fee Dispute Arising Post-Effective Date Is a Core Bankruptcy Matter When Its Resolution Requires Interpretation of Plan Injunction
Kenneth J. Enos
 
Kenneth J. Enos
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
Wilmington, Del.
 
Allison S. Mielke
 
Allison S. Mielke
Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, LLP
Wilmington, Del.
 
 
A plan sponsor’s financial advisor sues the plan sponsor and reorganized debtor for payment of a success fee arising from a purported financing transaction that allegedly closed post-effective date. In what forum should the suit be resolved? According to a recent decision from the Third Circuit, the suit is squarely within the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy court when such claims and issues require interpretation and enforcement of a plan injunction.

Bankruptcy Proceedings
In July 2016, ESML Holdings Inc. and Essar Steel Minnesota LLC (together, the debtors) filed voluntary chapter 11 petitions in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. During the chapter 11 Cases, Chippewa Capital Partners, LLC sought to acquire the debtors. Chippewa’s affiliate, ERP Iron Ore, retained B. Riley & Co., LLC (k/n/a B. Riley FBR, Inc. and referred to herein as “B. Riley”) as financial advisor to assist ERP and its affiliates (including Chippewa) with the acquisition.

The parties’ engagement agreement provided, among other things, that B. Riley would receive a success fee upon the consummation of certain financing transactions. Chippewa and the debtors implemented the acquisition through a chapter 11 plan whereby Chippewa served as plan sponsor and funded the debtors’ exit from chapter 11. The bankruptcy court entered an order confirming the plan. The plan and confirmation order implemented (1) a discharge of all claims against the debtors arising before the effective date of the plan, and (2) an injunction precluding the holders of such claims from bringing causes of action against the debtors and Chippewa.

 
READ MORE
 
 
 
 
CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY PROGRAM
 
 
 
WINTER LEADERSHIP CONFERENCE
 
 
 
logo-footer
 
icon_circle-facebook icon_circle-twitter icon_circle-linkedin icon_circle-instagram
 
©2022 American Bankruptcy Institute
All Rights Reserved.
66 Canal Center Plaza, Suite 600
Alexandria, VA 22314
 
View Online  |  Manage Your Preferences