![]() Volume 1, Number 1 |
|
U.S. Trustee Crusade Against Indemnity and Exculpation Clauses in Financial Advisor Retention Agreements Yields Mixed Results An admitted
campaign by the Office of the United States Trustee to bar indemnity and
exculpation provisions in retention agreements for financial advisors
hired by trustees, debtors and committees is yielding some results in
recent reported decisions. However, the attempt to generate a per se rule
against a bankruptcy professional’s obtaining, as a term of his
or her employment, indemnity or exculpation from the estate for his or
her acts of negligence has been unsuccessful. Recent Decisions Limit §1146(c) Relief Section 1146(c)
of the Code provides that delivery of an instrument of transfer (such
as a bill of sale or deed) “under a plan confirmed under §1129
of this title, may not be taxed under any law imposing a stamp tax or
similar tax.” In some jurisdictions, courts include in §363
sale orders entered in chapter 11 cases, preconfirmation, a provision
that the sale is not subject to transfer taxes under §1146(c) because
the sale is in contemplation of a plan. ABI’s Business Reorganization Committee will present a program at the Winter Leadership Conference in Tucson, Ariz., entitled “Emerging Issues In Hospitality, Entertainment Venue and Gaming Bankruptcies.” Panelists include Rudy J. Cerone, McGlinchey Stafford PLLC, Douglas Draper, Heller Draper Hayden Patrick & Horn LLC, and Linda F. Cantor, Pachulski, Stang, Ziehl, Young & Jones PC. The program will be part of the committee’s meeting on Dec. 6, 2002, at 8:00 a.m. In light of recent filings, such as the Windsor Woodmont case (involving Colorado’s Black Hawk Casino), the program promises to be timely and informative. In addition, watch for the debut of the committee’s column, “News at 11,” in the December/January issue of the ABI Journal. |