Business Reorganization Committee

ABI Committee News

In re Moran: Why a Third-Party Challenger to a Court-Ordered Transfer Must Satisfy the "Persons Aggrieved" Standard

Standing is “an essential and unchanging part of the case-or-controversy requirement of Article III.”[1] In challenging a bankruptcy court order, the right of appellate review has historically been limited to “persons aggrieved.”[2] The Seventh Circuit stated that the “persons-aggrieved” standard is stricter than the “general Article III” standard in order to prevent protracted litigation by those not directly affected by a bankruptcy order.[3]

In In re Moran,[4] the Sixth Circuit revisited appellate-standing and persons-aggrieved standard issues when a third-party challenger contested the bankruptcy court order allowing an abandonment of stock by an estate back to its original debtor.[5] In denying the third-party challenger’s appeal, the Sixth Circuit provided clear standing guidelines for a third party seeking to challenge an abandonment order.

Read the full article.

Bankruptcy 2010: Views from the Bench

Submit Articles for the Business Reorganization Committee Newsletter