![]() Volume 2, Number 4 |
|
Third Circuit Says Trustee
Gets to Start With Clean
In
a recent decision sure to
cause some commotion, the
Third Circuit has stripped
an innocent transferee of
its statutory defenses and
created a new “innocent
trustee” defense in
a case where it found that
a chapter 7 trustee who
proceeds under 11 U.S.C.
§548, as
opposed to §541, no
longer comes to a lawsuit
burdened by the pre-petition
facts that might have been
defensively asserted against
his debtor. McNamara
v. PFS a/k/a Premium Finance
Specialists (In re The Personal
and Business Ins. Agency),
___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2003)(June
26, 2003, Cause No. 02-1192). In
what could be a fatal blow
for transfer-tax-free sales
under §363, the Third
Circuit Court of Appeals
has held that §1146(c)
of the Bankruptcy Code does
not apply to real estate
transactions that occur
prior to the confirmation
of a plan under chapter
11 of the Code, even if
(as was true in the Third
Circuit case) a plan was
filed when the sales occurred,
the amount of possible tax
was escrowed pending confirmation
of the plan, and the plan
was eventually confirmed.
Baltimore County v.
Hechinger Liquidation Trust
(In re Hechinger Investment
Co. of Delaware Inc.),
No. 02-1917 (3rd Cir., 7/18/03).
Section 1146(c) provides,
in pertinent part, that
“…delivery of
an instrument of transfer
under a plan confirmed under
§1129 of this title,
may not be taxed under any
law imposing a stamp tax
or similar tax.” Most
§363 sale orders in
chapter 11 cases include
a provision that the sale
is in contemplation of a
plan and is necessary for
a plan and exempt the transaction
under §1146(c), conditioned
upon the set aside of amounts
necessary to pay the tax
(if no plan is confirmed)
and subsequent confirmation
of a plan. If Hechinger
becomes the “law
of the land,” this
practice is no longer permissible
and such pre-confirmation
transactions will be subject
to tax. As previously announced, the Business Reorganization Committee and the International Committee will present a joint program at the ABI Winter Leadership Conference. The program, to be presented as a plenary session continuing into a workshop program at the joint committee meeting, will be entitled "A Tale of Two Systems: Airline Insolvency Proceedings Under the Code and the CCAA." This panel—consisting of major players from the reorganization cases of U.S and Canadian airlines—will compare and contrast actual reorganization proceedings under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code and the Canadian Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA). The panel will explore—with examples from recent reorganization cases—the advantages, disadvantages and challenges of each system and statute. Among the subjects to be explored will be "first-day" proceedings, financing the case, problems with (and of) aircraft lenders and lessors, and collective bargaining agreements and other labor issues. The program will provide an insider's look at the functioning of two insolvency systems in connection with a comparable airline "mega-case." |